Phelps v. Phelps

New York Supreme Court

Phelps v. Phelps

27 N.Y.S. 620, 75 Hun 577, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 608

DecidedFebruary 12, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 27 N.Y.S. 620 (Phelps v. Phelps) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phelps v. Phelps, 27 N.Y.S. 620, 75 Hun 577, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 608 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PRATT, J.

This case involves the question whether a wife can maintain an action to have inchoate dower declared in property not standing in her husband’s name, and to which he never had the legal title. It is raised by a demurrer to the complaint. Leaving out an allegation in the complaint that the defendant holds an agreement in writing, signed by a person holding the legal title by deed, that it is held for the benefit of defendant, I think, under the law in this state, the demurrer was well pleaded. The complaint fails to state in full what the agreement is, or that it would give the defendant a right to have a conveyance made to himself of the fee. The respondent has quoted a large number of cases, none [622]*622of which clearly hold that a wife is dowable in property so held, except cases in other states where there is a statute giving dower in equitable estate held by the husband. While there is no direct authority in favor of respondent’s contention, yet there are expressions which seem to lean in that direction, and an opinion of the court of last resort can only settle the question. The case is on the border line, and, in the absence of any direct authority upon either side, we have concluded to affirm the decision below, as being the most equitable view of matters. Affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PRATT, J.

This case involves the question whether a wife can maintain an action to have inchoate dower declared in property not standing in her husband’s name, and to which he never had the legal title. It is raised by a demurrer to the complaint. Leaving out an allegation in the complaint that the defendant holds an agreement in writing, signed by a person holding the legal title by deed, that it is held for the benefit of defendant, I think, under the law in this state, the demurrer was well pleaded. The complaint fails to state in full what the agreement is, or that it would give the defendant a right to have a conveyance made to himself of the fee. The respondent has quoted a large number of cases, none [622]*622of which clearly hold that a wife is dowable in property so held, except cases in other states where there is a statute giving dower in equitable estate held by the husband. While there is no direct authority in favor of respondent’s contention, yet there are expressions which seem to lean in that direction, and an opinion of the court of last resort can only settle the question. The case is on the border line, and, in the absence of any direct authority upon either side, we have concluded to affirm the decision below, as being the most equitable view of matters. Affirmed, with costs. All concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

27 N.Y.S. 620, 75 Hun 577, 82 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 577, 59 N.Y. St. Rep. 608, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-phelps-nysupct-1894.