Phelps v. Perry

Fourth Circuit

Phelps v. Perry

613 F. App'x 251

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 25, 2015·No. No. 15-6703·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John C. Phelps appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint after the district court dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012), for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Phelps v. Perry, No. 1:14-cv-00133 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

John C. Phelps appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to amend his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint after the district court dismissed the complaint, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(l) (2012), for failure to state a claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Phelps v. Perry, No. 1:14-cv-00133 (W.D.N.C. Apr. 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Phelps v. Perry, 613 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

613 F. App'x 251 (Phelps v. Perry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related