Phelps v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad
95 N.Y.S. 1154
Opinion
Interlocutory judgment and order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to plead over upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal, upon the authority of Shea v. Sixth Avenue Elevated Railway Company, 62 N. Y. 180, 20 Am. Rep. 480, Hoffman v. King, 160 N. Y. 618, 55 N. E. 401, 46 L. R. A. 672, 73 Am. St. Rep. 715, and Van Inwegen v. Port Jervis, M. & N. Y. R. Co., 165 N. Y. 625, 58 N. E. 878.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phelps v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 95 N.Y.S. 1154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).
95 N.Y.S. 1154 (Phelps v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Van Inwegen v. Port Jervis, Monticello & New York Railroad
59 N.E. 1118 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Shea v. . Sixth Avenue R.R. Co.
62 N.Y. 180 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
American Copper Company v. . Lowther
58 N.E. 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Hoffman v. . King
55 N.E. 401 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)