Phelps v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad

95 N.Y.S. 1154

This text of 95 N.Y.S. 1154 (Phelps v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phelps v. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad, 95 N.Y.S. 1154 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1905).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Interlocutory judgment and order reversed, with costs, and defendant’s demurrer sustained, with costs, with leave to plead over upon payment of the costs of the demurrer and of this appeal, upon the authority of Shea v. Sixth Avenue Elevated Railway Company, 62 N. Y. 180, 20 Am. Rep. 480, Hoffman v. King, 160 N. Y. 618, 55 N. E. 401, 46 L. R. A. 672, 73 Am. St. Rep. 715, and Van Inwegen v. Port Jervis, M. & N. Y. R. Co., 165 N. Y. 625, 58 N. E. 878.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Van Inwegen v. Port Jervis, Monticello & New York Railroad
59 N.E. 1118 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Shea v. . Sixth Avenue R.R. Co.
62 N.Y. 180 (New York Court of Appeals, 1875)
American Copper Company v. . Lowther
58 N.E. 878 (New York Court of Appeals, 1900)
Hoffman v. . King
55 N.E. 401 (New York Court of Appeals, 1899)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 N.Y.S. 1154, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-new-york-central-hudson-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1905.