Phelps v. Maxwell

2 Abb. N. Cas. 459
New York Supreme Court·Decided September 15, 1877·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Westbrook, J.,

Vacated the order for the following, among other reasons : 1. The written declaration was so long prior to the sales that facts connecting it with the sales should be shown. 2. The oral statements to the plaintiff should, by a recital of the interview during which they were made, be connected with the actual sales: a general statement of a party that they were made to induce a credit cannot be accepted as proof. A party’s conclusions are no evidence ; he should state facts, so that the court can draw the conclusions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phelps v. Maxwell, 2 Abb. N. Cas. 459 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1877).

2 Abb. N. Cas. 459 (Phelps v. Maxwell) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diad v. Shibley
49 Misc. 315 (New York Supreme Court, 1906)
Flatow v. Von Bremsen
11 N.Y.S. 677 (City of New York Municipal Court, 1890)