Phelps v. Dougherty

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Phelps v. Dougherty

149 S.E. 328, 40 Ga. App. 261, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 118

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedAugust 23, 1929

Docket19831

StatusPublished

This text of 149 S.E. 328 (Phelps v. Dougherty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phelps v. Dougherty, 149 S.E. 328, 40 Ga. App. 261, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 118 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the special assignments of error in the petition for certiorari. There is ample evidence to support the verdict of the jury, and the judgment rendered by the judge of the municipal court of Atlanta in the trial of the case, which judgment was concurred in by the appellate division of the municipal court; and the judge of the superior court did not err when he overruled the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., eoneur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bloodworth, J.

There is no merit in any of the special assignments of error in the petition for certiorari. There is ample evidence to support the verdict of the jury, and the judgment rendered by the judge of the municipal court of Atlanta in the trial of the case, which judgment was concurred in by the appellate division of the municipal court; and the judge of the superior court did not err when he overruled the certiorari.

Judgment affirmed.

Broyles, G. J., and Lulce, J., eoneur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

149 S.E. 328, 40 Ga. App. 261, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 118, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-dougherty-gactapp-1929.