Phelps v. Cole

2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 167
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 15, 1850
StatusPublished

This text of 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 167 (Phelps v. Cole) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phelps v. Cole, 2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 167 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1850).

Opinion

Edmonds, J.:

A receiver must not subject the estate committed to him to unnecessary expense. He cannot bring a suit without consent of the court, nor even defend one brought against him, without such leave, where either such prosecution or defense are to charge the expenses to the estate. He is an officer of the court, charged with the duty of taking care of property in the possession of the court, and he cannot incur expense in regard to it without the court’s leave.

This plaintiff might have protected himself by first applying to the court for leave to prosecute this suit; but not having chosen to do so, he cannot avail himself of his official character to escape the responsibility growing out of his false clamor. This is the general rule, to which there are exceptions, but the plaintiff shows nothing to bring himself within any of them. Any other rule would enable receivers to harrass and oppress others at pleasure, and with impunity.

The motion for costs against the plaintiff, personally, must be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2 Edm. Sel. Cas. 167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-cole-nysupct-1850.