Phelps v. Campbell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Phelps v. Campbell

115 S.W.2d 744, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1042

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedMarch 17, 1938

DocketNo. 10768.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 115 S.W.2d 744 (Phelps v. Campbell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phelps v. Campbell, 115 S.W.2d 744, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1042 (Tex. Ct. App. 1938).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Justice.

Relator’s application for writs of mandamus in this cause will be refused, upon the conclusion that it appears from the record herein that he subjected himself to' the general jurisdiction of the trial court in all the matters as to which he complains, and that the learned trial judge was shown to be in the exercise of his judicial discretion in taking the action and entering the judgment assailed by the relator herein; wherefore, mandamus does not lie.

Writs of mandamus refused.

PLEASANTS, C. J., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Justice.

Relator’s application for writs of mandamus in this cause will be refused, upon the conclusion that it appears from the record herein that he subjected himself to' the general jurisdiction of the trial court in all the matters as to which he complains, and that the learned trial judge was shown to be in the exercise of his judicial discretion in taking the action and entering the judgment assailed by the relator herein; wherefore, mandamus does not lie.

Writs of mandamus refused.

PLEASANTS, C. J., absent.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

115 S.W.2d 744, 1938 Tex. App. LEXIS 1042, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-campbell-texapp-1938.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack