Phelps v. . Blount

13 N.C. 177
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1829
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 13 N.C. 177 (Phelps v. . Blount) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phelps v. . Blount, 13 N.C. 177 (N.C. 1829).

Opinion

Henderson, Chief-Justice.

I think the Judge erred in not extending the estoppel to Blount, for the case states, that Swain and the Defendant, under Swain’s pretended title, entered upon the land. Now it appears to me, that if Swain is estopped from setting up title, in himself, that Blount, who acted under that title, or to use the words of the case, the pretended title of Swain, is equally estopped; and that a title by estoppel, will, as to them estopped, as well as a title against the world, draw to it the possession. Which constructive possession, according to our notions, supports the action of trespass.

Per Curiam. — Let the judgment below be reversed, and a new trial granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Drake v. . Howell
45 S.E. 539 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)
McMillan v. . Hafley
4 N.C. 186 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1815)
Gray v. . Harrison
3 N.C. 292 (Superior Court of North Carolina, 1804)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 N.C. 177, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-blount-nc-1829.