Phelps v. Ball
1 Johns. Cas. 31
Opinion
Take your rule.
S. C., C. C. 66. So a ca. sa. on which the defendant had been taken, was allowed to be amended by adding the testatum clause. McIntyre v. Rowan, 3 Johns. R. 144; Graham’s Pr. 2d ed. 665, 666.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phelps v. Ball, 1 Johns. Cas. 31 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
1 Johns. Cas. 31 (Phelps v. Ball) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Elliott v. Hart
7 N.W. 812 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)
Blanchard v. Waters
51 Mass. 185 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1845)