Phelps v. Ball
1 Johns. Cas. 31
This text of 1 Johns. Cas. 31 (Phelps v. Ball) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Phelps v. Ball, 1 Johns. Cas. 31 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1799).
Opinion
Take your rule.
S. C., C. C. 66. So a ca. sa. on which the defendant had been taken, was allowed to be amended by adding the testatum clause. McIntyre v. Rowan, 3 Johns. R. 144; Graham’s Pr. 2d ed. 665, 666.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Elliott v. Hart
7 N.W. 812 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)
Blanchard v. Waters
51 Mass. 185 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1845)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Johns. Cas. 31, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelps-v-ball-nysupct-1799.