Phelps v. Ashcroft

Fourth Circuit

Phelps v. Ashcroft

79 F. App'x 606

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 31, 2003·No. No. 03-7087·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Coy Phelps appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(Z) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Phelps v. Ashcroft, No. CA-03-461-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Coy Phelps appeals the district court’s orders dismissing his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971), as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b)(Z) (2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Phelps v. Ashcroft, No. CA-03-461-5-H (E.D.N.C. July 7, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Phelps v. Ashcroft, 79 F. App'x 606 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

79 F. App'x 606 (Phelps v. Ashcroft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related