Phelan v. Smith
8 Cal. 520
This text of 8 Cal. 520 (Phelan v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Phelan v. Smith, 8 Cal. 520 (Cal. 1857).
Opinion
The demurrer was properly sustained, for two reasons.
1. A State Court cannot enjoin the proceedings of a Federal Court. 1 Kent, 451.
2. A Court of co-ordinate jurisdiction cannot restrain the proceedings of another Court of the same jurisdiction. Ricketts and Wife v. Johnson and others, July, 1857.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Prugh v. Portsmouth Savings Bank
67 N.W. 309 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Harvick v. State
49 Ark. 514 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1887)
Territory of Montana v. Duncan
5 Mont. 478 (Montana Supreme Court, 1885)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Cal. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelan-v-smith-cal-1857.