Phelan v. Smith

8 Cal. 520
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1857·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

The demurrer was properly sustained, for two reasons.

1. A State Court cannot enjoin the proceedings of a Federal Court. 1 Kent, 451.

2. A Court of co-ordinate jurisdiction cannot restrain the proceedings of another Court of the same jurisdiction. Ricketts and Wife v. Johnson and others, July, 1857.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phelan v. Smith, 8 Cal. 520 (Cal. 1857).

8 Cal. 520 (Phelan v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Prugh v. Portsmouth Savings Bank
67 N.W. 309 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Harvick v. State
49 Ark. 514 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1887)
Territory of Montana v. Duncan
5 Mont. 478 (Montana Supreme Court, 1885)