Phelan v. Smith

8 Cal. 520
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1857
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 8 Cal. 520 (Phelan v. Smith) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phelan v. Smith, 8 Cal. 520 (Cal. 1857).

Opinion

Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Terry, C. J., concurring.

The demurrer was properly sustained, for two reasons.

1. A State Court cannot enjoin the proceedings of a Federal Court. 1 Kent, 451.

2. A Court of co-ordinate jurisdiction cannot restrain the proceedings of another Court of the same jurisdiction. Ricketts and Wife v. Johnson and others, July, 1857.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Prugh v. Portsmouth Savings Bank
67 N.W. 309 (Nebraska Supreme Court, 1896)
Harvick v. State
49 Ark. 514 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1887)
Territory of Montana v. Duncan
5 Mont. 478 (Montana Supreme Court, 1885)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 Cal. 520, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelan-v-smith-cal-1857.