Phelan v. City & County of San Francisco
This text of 62 Cal. 44 (Phelan v. City & County of San Francisco) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conceding that for certain purposes the sidewalk is a portion of the street, we can not say that Section 22 of Chapter 4, of Order 697 of the Board of Supervisors of the City and County of San Francisco, was intended to require the sidewalk, as well as the roadway, to be “sewered with bride and paved cmd curbed with stone.” As we understand, the sewer was to be of brick, and the roadway was to be paved, and the sidewalk curbed. These requirements appear to have been complied with. Each requirement was to have reference to the object to be accomplished; and the board, in accepting the street, determined that the respective objects had been accomplished.
Judgment and order affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
62 Cal. 44, 1882 Cal. LEXIS 696, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phelan-v-city-county-of-san-francisco-cal-1882.