Pharo v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

New York Court of Appeals

Pharo v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.

275 N.E.2d 333, 29 N.Y.2d 710, 325 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1022

DecidedOctober 20, 1971

StatusPublished

This text of 275 N.E.2d 333 (Pharo v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pharo v. Piedmont Aviation, Inc., 275 N.E.2d 333, 29 N.Y.2d 710, 325 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1022 (N.Y. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

In each action: Order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in deciding to refuse jurisdiction. The circumstance that, in this action brought by a nonresident plaintiff, one of the defendants is a domestic corporation does not require that this State entertain the suit insofar as other foreign corporations and other nonresidents are concerned.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In each action: Order affirmed, without costs. The Appellate Division did not abuse its discretion in deciding to refuse jurisdiction. The circumstance that, in this action brought by a nonresident plaintiff, one of the defendants is a domestic corporation does not require that this State entertain the suit insofar as other foreign corporations and other nonresidents are concerned.

Concur: Chief Judge Fuld and Judges Burke, Scileppi, Bergan, Breitel, Jasen and Gibson.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

275 N.E.2d 333, 29 N.Y.2d 710, 325 N.Y.S.2d 750, 1971 N.Y. LEXIS 1022, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pharo-v-piedmont-aviation-inc-ny-1971.