Phariss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Phariss v. State

176 S.W.2d 196

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedDecember 8, 1943

DocketNo. 22648

StatusPublished

This text of 176 S.W.2d 196 (Phariss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phariss v. State, 176 S.W.2d 196 (Tex. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of McCulloch County for the violation of the liquor law, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq., and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The complaint and information appear regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment of the trial court, therefore, will be in all things affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

GRAVES, Judge.

Appellant was convicted in the county court of McCulloch County for the violation of the liquor law, Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 — 1 et seq., and his punishment was assessed at a fine of $100.

The complaint and information appear regular. The record is before this court without statement of facts or bills of exceptions. In the absence of the evidence adduced upon the trial, this court is unable to appraise the matters presented in the motion for new trial.

The judgment of the trial court, therefore, will be in all things affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

176 S.W.2d 196, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phariss-v-state-texcrimapp-1943.