Phariss v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Phariss v. State

91 S.W.2d 736

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedFebruary 26, 1936

DocketNo. 18019

StatusPublished

This text of 91 S.W.2d 736 (Phariss v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Phariss v. State, 91 S.W.2d 736 (Tex. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 et seq.) upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666—49). See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

The offense is the unlawful possession of intoxicating liquor for the purpose of sale; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

Since the conviction of the appellant, the law (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666 et seq.) upon which the prosecution is founded has been repealed (Vernon’s Ann.P.C. art. 666—49). See Meadows v. State (Tex.Cr.App.) 88 S.W.(2d) 481.

The judgment is reversed, and the prosecution ordered dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

91 S.W.2d 736, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phariss-v-state-texcrimapp-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack