Pharis v. Joiner

269 So. 2d 317, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6641
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedMay 26, 1972
DocketNo. 3849
StatusPublished

This text of 269 So. 2d 317 (Pharis v. Joiner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pharis v. Joiner, 269 So. 2d 317, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6641 (La. Ct. App. 1972).

Opinions

SAVOY, Judge.

Plaintiff, a firm of practicing attorneys, represented the wife of defendant in a separation suit. The parties reconciled, and plaintiff filed suit against defendant for attorney’s fees and for expenses incurred in representing the wife. Defendant filed a general denial to the allegations of plaintiff’s petition. On the date of trial, counsel for defendant withdrew from the case, stating to the court that he had notified defendant in advance that he could not represent him. Defendant agreed to proceed with the trial. After a trial on the merits, there was judgment in favor of plaintiff in the sum of $846.38, the amount prayed for in plaintiff’s petition. Defendant has appealed to this Court.

We have before us the record in the separation suit between defendant and his wife. Considering the amount of work done by plaintiff in the 'separation suit, we cannot say that the sum awarded by the trial judge for attorney’s fees and for expenses incurred is excessive.

[318]*318For the reasons assigned the judgment of the district court is affirmed at defendant’s costs.

Affirmed.

Before SAVOY, HOOD and MILLER, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Salley Grocer Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indem. Co.
223 So. 2d 5 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1969)
B. Stern Co. v. Perry
246 So. 2d 246 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
269 So. 2d 317, 1972 La. App. LEXIS 6641, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pharis-v-joiner-lactapp-1972.