Pharion v. State

110 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 689
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedNovember 16, 1926
Docket4 Div. 207.
StatusPublished

This text of 110 So. 924 (Pharion v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pharion v. State, 110 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Opinion

SAMFORD, J.

Defendant was convicted on an indictment charging grand larceny and receiving stolen property, and appeals. The defendant was found in the possession of an automobile recently stolen.. The facts and circumstances in evidence justified a conviction under either count of the indictment. The other exceptions have been examined and found not to constitute reversible error. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 689, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pharion-v-state-alactapp-1926.