Pharion v. State
110 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 689
Opinion
Defendant was convicted on an indictment charging grand larceny and receiving stolen property, and appeals. The defendant was found in the possession of an automobile recently stolen.. The facts and circumstances in evidence justified a conviction under either count of the indictment. The other exceptions have been examined and found not to constitute reversible error. Let the judgment be affirmed. Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pharion v. State, 110 So. 924, 21 Ala. App. 689 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).
110 So. 924 (Pharion v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.