Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Phaneuf v. State

Phaneuf v. State

557 So. 2d 685, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1990 WL 20383
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 8, 1990
DocketNo. 89-66
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 557 So. 2d 685 (Phaneuf v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phaneuf v. State, 557 So. 2d 685, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1990 WL 20383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

GRIFFIN, Judge.

This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. The reasons given for de[686]*686parture were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565, — So.2d - (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.

Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.

COBB and PETERSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Lipscomb v. State
573 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Ramsey v. State
562 So. 2d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Roberts v. State
557 So. 2d 685 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
557 So. 2d 685, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1990 WL 20383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phaneuf-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.