Phaneuf v. State
557 So. 2d 685, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1990 WL 20383
Opinion
This is an appeal from a guideline departure sentence. The reasons given for de[686] parture were based on probation violations and are invalid. Lambert v. State, 545 So.2d 838 (Fla.1989); Ree v. State, 14 F.L.W. 565, — So.2d - (Fla. Nov. 16, 1989). Accordingly, the defendant’s sentence is vacated and the cause remanded for resentencing within the guidelines.
Sentence VACATED; case REMANDED for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Phaneuf v. State, 557 So. 2d 685, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 1372, 1990 WL 20383 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
557 So. 2d 685 (Phaneuf v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Lipscomb v. State
573 So. 2d 429 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Ramsey v. State
562 So. 2d 394 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)
Roberts v. State
557 So. 2d 685 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1990)