Phan v. State

686 So. 2d 21, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7870, 1996 WL 417530
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 26, 1996·No. No. 94-01546·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, To Van Phan, challenges his convictions for aggravated assault, two counts of aggravated battery and one count of battery. We find merit only in two challenges to his sentence. The defendant asserts that the order of probation incorrectly states that he entered a guilty plea. We remand for correction of the scrivener’s error to reflect that the defendant was tried and found guilty by a jury. The defendant need not be present. We also strike the cost of $2 imposed pursuant to section 943.25(13), Florida Statutes (1993), and the assessment of $15 payable to the Hillsborough County Court Improvement Fund. See Reyes v. State, 655 So.2d 111 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995) (en banc). In all other respects, the judgment and sentence is affirmed.

SCHOONOVER, A.C.J., and FULMER and WHATLEY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Phan v. State, 686 So. 2d 21, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 7870, 1996 WL 417530 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

686 So. 2d 21 (Phan v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Butchek v. State
686 So. 2d 21 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)