Pham v. State

762 So. 2d 597, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9909, 2000 WL 1071818
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedAugust 4, 2000
DocketNo. 5D00-1468
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 762 So. 2d 597 (Pham v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pham v. State, 762 So. 2d 597, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9909, 2000 WL 1071818 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

THOMPSON, C.J.,

Due M. Pham appeals the denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. He contends that he was sentenced to 64.2 months in prison under the 1995 sentencing guidelines, and that under the 1994 guidelines, the maximum sentence would have been 45.7 months incarceration. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with Heggs v. State, 759 So.2d 620 (Fla.2000), and Parker v. State, Case No. 5D99-3349, — So.2d -, 2000 WL 1144594 (Fla. Aug. 11, 2000).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

COBB and W. SHARP, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Spacco v. State
762 So. 2d 597 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
762 So. 2d 597, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 9909, 2000 WL 1071818, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pham-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.