Phaison v. State
This text of 759 A.2d 228 (Phaison v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The Court having considered and granted the petition for a writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 11th day of September, 2000
ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals be, and it is hereby, summarily reversed in light of Kent v. State, 358 Md. 183, 747 A.2d 656 (2000); Johnson v. State, 355 Md. 420, 735 A.2d 1003 (1999); Okon v. State, 346 Md. 249, 696 A.2d 441 (1997); Moten v. State, 339 Md. 407, 663 A.2d 593 (1995); and Parren v. State, 309 Md. 260, 523 A.2d 597 (1987), and the case is remanded to the Court of Special Appeals with directions to reverse the judgment of the Circuit Court for Dorchester County and remand the ease to that court for a new trial. [483]*483Costs in this Court and in the Court of Special Appeals to be paid by Dorchester County.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
759 A.2d 228, 360 Md. 482, 2000 Md. LEXIS 596, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phaison-v-state-md-2000.