Phaeton Realty Corp. v. Hugo Gnam & Son, Inc.

187 Misc. 1063, 66 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3045
CourtAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
DecidedOctober 24, 1946
StatusPublished

This text of 187 Misc. 1063 (Phaeton Realty Corp. v. Hugo Gnam & Son, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Phaeton Realty Corp. v. Hugo Gnam & Son, Inc., 187 Misc. 1063, 66 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3045 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1946).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Memorandum The tenant was entitled under clause (1) of subdivision (b) of section 8 of chapter 314 of the Laws of 1945 to a written notice of the existence of the violation complained of and an opportunity to cure the same after written notice that it cease. No such notice or opportunity was given by the landlord to the tenant. This was fatal to the landlord’s right to institute and maintain the proceeding. The petition is also jurisdictionally defective in failing to allege the giving of such notice and opportunity (Gilroy v. Becker, 186 Misc. 93).

The final order should be reversed, with $30 costs, and petition dismissed, with costs.

McLaughlin, Eder and IIechx, JJ., concur.

Order reversed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gilroy v. Becker
186 Misc. 93 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
187 Misc. 1063, 66 N.Y.S.2d 296, 1946 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 3045, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/phaeton-realty-corp-v-hugo-gnam-son-inc-nyappterm-1946.