PGA National Golf Club v. Petty
This text of 304 So. 2d 141 (PGA National Golf Club v. Petty) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner urges its entitlement to review by a common law writ of certiorari of a judgment rendered by the circuit court sitting as an appellate court in a direct appeal from the county court. To prevail, petitioner must demonstrate a departure from the essential requirements of law, Kennington v. Gillman, Fla.App. 1973, 284 So.2d 405, which the record does not demonstrate. There was competent substantial evidence upon which to predicate a finding that petitioner was negligent in the care and handling of respondent’s golf clubs and that no theft occurred.
Accordingly, the writ of certiorari is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
304 So. 2d 141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pga-national-golf-club-v-petty-fladistctapp-1974.