Pfluger v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.
This text of 170 A.D. 915 (Pfluger v. Interborough Rapid Transit Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Under the proofs in this case, there was an issue for the jury whether warning was or should have been given, and whether plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. The judgment and order are, therefore, reversed, and a new trial granted, costs to abide the event. Jenks, P. J., Thomas, Carr, Stapleton and Putnam, JJ., concurred.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
170 A.D. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfluger-v-interborough-rapid-transit-co-nyappdiv-1915.