PFJ Med. Care, P.C. v. Nationwide Ins.
This text of 75 Misc. 3d 137(A) (PFJ Med. Care, P.C. v. Nationwide Ins.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PFJ Med. Care, P.C. v Nationwide Ins. (2022 NY Slip Op 50570(U)) [*1]
| PFJ Med. Care, P.C. v Nationwide Ins. |
| 2022 NY Slip Op 50570(U) [75 Misc 3d 137(A)] |
| Decided on June 10, 2022 |
| Appellate Term, Second Department |
| Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431. |
| This opinion is uncorrected and will not be published in the printed Official Reports. |
Decided on June 10, 2022
PRESENT: : THOMAS P. ALIOTTA, P.J., WAVNY TOUSSAINT, DONNA-MARIE E. GOLIA, JJ
2020-74 K C
against
Nationwide Ins., Respondent.
The Rybak Firm, PLLC (Damin J. Toell of counsel), for appellant. Hollander Legal Group, P.C. (Allan S. Hollander of counsel), for respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Civil Court of the City of New York, Kings County (Robin Kelly Sheares, J.), entered September 26, 2019. The order denied plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granted defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with $25 costs.
In this action by a provider to recover assigned first-party no-fault benefits, plaintiff appeals from an order denying plaintiff's motion for summary judgment and granting defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Contrary to plaintiff's sole contention on appeal with respect to defendant's cross motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, the affirmations submitted by defendant's counsel, as well as the transcripts of the examinations under oath (EUOs), were sufficient to establish that plaintiff had failed to appear for the EUOs (see Pavlova v Nationwide Ins., 70 Misc 3d 144[A], 2021 NY Slip Op 50213[U] [App Term, 2d Dept, 2d, 11th & 13th Jud Dists 2021]).
Accordingly, the order is affirmed.
ALIOTTA, P.J., TOUSSAINT and GOLIA, JJ., concur.
ENTER:
Paul Kenny
Chief Clerk
Decision Date: June 10, 2022
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
75 Misc. 3d 137(A), 2022 NY Slip Op 50570(U), Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfj-med-care-pc-v-nationwide-ins-nyappterm-2022.