Pfender v. Pfender
147 A. 911, 105 N.J. Eq. 247, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 567
Opinion
The decree appealed from -will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor 'Berry, and reported in 104 N. J. Eq. 107.
For affirmance — The Chief-Justice, Parker, Kalisch, Black, Campbell, Lloyd, Case, Bodine, White, Van Buskirk, McGlennon, Kays, Hetfield, Dear, JJ. 14.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Pfender v. Pfender, 147 A. 911, 105 N.J. Eq. 247, 1929 N.J. LEXIS 567 (N.J. 1929).
147 A. 911 (Pfender v. Pfender) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Loeb v. Loeb
235 A.2d 20 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1967)
Pollino v. Pollino
121 A.2d 62 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1956)
Hughes v. Eisner
81 A.2d 394 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Medical Fabrics Co. v. DC McLintock Co.
79 A.2d 313 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Clark v. Watts
77 A.2d 188 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
P.L.J., Inc. v. Hinners
188 A. 496 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Meyer v. Blacker
184 A. 191 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1936)
Kem Products Co. v. Levin
177 A. 77 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1935)
Zearfoss v. Zearfoss
164 A. 893 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1933)
Pfender v. Pfender
150 A. 832 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1930)
Journal Plaza Holding Co. v. J.L.H. Co.
147 A. 581 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1929)