Pfeil v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pfeil v. State

473 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1863, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14768

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 1, 1985·No. No. 84-1292·Published

Opinion

ORFINGER, Judge.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. However, because this court has previously determined that the appellant’s airplane was not subject to forfeiture, see Pheil v. Griffin, 469 So.2d 942 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), the condition of probation imposed here that appellant turn over the plane’s log book to the Lake County Sheriff’s Office is improper, and it is hereby stricken. As [277] modified, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, J., and KIRKWOOD, L.R., Associate Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORFINGER, Judge.

The judgment of conviction is affirmed. However, because this court has previously determined that the appellant’s airplane was not subject to forfeiture, see Pheil v. Griffin, 469 So.2d 942 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), the condition of probation imposed here that appellant turn over the plane’s log book to the Lake County Sheriff’s Office is improper, and it is hereby stricken. As [277] modified, the judgment and sentence are affirmed.

AFFIRMED as modified.

DAUKSCH, J., and KIRKWOOD, L.R., Associate Judge, concur.

Pfeil v. State, 473 So. 2d 276, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 1863, 1985 Fla. App. LEXIS 14768 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

473 So. 2d 276 (Pfeil v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related