Pfeil v. Hasselbush
249 A.D. 817, 292 N.Y.S. 1017
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 8, 1937
StatusPublished
This text of 249 A.D. 817 (Pfeil v. Hasselbush) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pfeil v. Hasselbush, 249 A.D. 817, 292 N.Y.S. 1017 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1937).
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. [See ante, p. 766.] The following question is certified: Do the facts set forth in the second paragraph of the amended answer constitute a defense to the cause of action set forth in the complaint? Present — Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ.; Close, J., not voting.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
249 A.D. 817, 292 N.Y.S. 1017, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeil-v-hasselbush-nyappdiv-1937.