Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer

553 So. 2d 339, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6719, 1989 WL 146188

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedDecember 6, 1989

DocketNo. 89-0189

StatusPublished

This text of 553 So. 2d 339 (Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pfeiffer v. Pfeiffer, 553 So. 2d 339, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6719, 1989 WL 146188 (Fla. Ct. App. 1989).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appeal and cross appeal except for the equitable distribution. Because of a mathematical error in the present day valuation of the insurance agency, a marital asset, we remand for the trial court — at the individual expense of the respective parties — to correct same and to effect such equitable distribution as the [340]*340trial court may determine based on a correct valuation figure.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the appeal and cross appeal except for the equitable distribution. Because of a mathematical error in the present day valuation of the insurance agency, a marital asset, we remand for the trial court — at the individual expense of the respective parties — to correct same and to effect such equitable distribution as the [340]*340trial court may determine based on a correct valuation figure.

ANSTEAD, GLICKSTEIN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

553 So. 2d 339, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 2781, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 6719, 1989 WL 146188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeiffer-v-pfeiffer-fladistctapp-1989.