Pfeiffer v. Joline
114 N.Y.S. 219
This text of 114 N.Y.S. 219 (Pfeiffer v. Joline) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Pfeiffer v. Joline, 114 N.Y.S. 219 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).
Opinion
The exclusion of the defendants from participation in the trial because of the nonpayment of costs, imposed as terms for continuance, was without warrant in law. Barber v. Flauman, 30 Mise. Rep. 627, 62 N. Y. Supp. 784.
Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Farber v. Flauman
30 Misc. 627 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1900)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
114 N.Y.S. 219, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeiffer-v-joline-nyappterm-1909.