Pfeiffer v. Iron Elevator & Transfer Co.

164 A.D. 966, 149 N.Y.S. 1106

This text of 164 A.D. 966 (Pfeiffer v. Iron Elevator & Transfer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pfeiffer v. Iron Elevator & Transfer Co., 164 A.D. 966, 149 N.Y.S. 1106 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1914).

Opinion

Per Curiam: Hpon the former appeal the verdict was hold to be “ contrary to and against the weight of the evidence.” We now hold, upon the present record, not only that the .weight of the evidence is against the plaintiff upon the question of defendant’s negligence, but also that as a matter of law the evidence is insufficient to establish actionable negligence against the defendant. The record discloses no reversible error, and, therefore, the plaintiff’s exceptions should be overruled, the motion for a new trial denied, and judgment having been entered, and an appeal also taken therefrom, the judgment should' be affirmed, with costs. All concurred, Plaintiff’s exceptions over[967]*967ruled, motion for new trial denied, and judgment having been entered and an appeal taken therefrom, the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
164 A.D. 966, 149 N.Y.S. 1106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeiffer-v-iron-elevator-transfer-co-nyappdiv-1914.