Pfeiffer v. Crossley

106 A. 892, 92 N.J.L. 638, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 233
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Pfeiffer v. Crossley. Read the opinion of the Court — 91 N.J.L. 433
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided February 6, 1919·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Parker in the Supreme Court.

For affirmance — The Chancellor, Swayze, Trenchard, Bergen, Minturn, Black, White, Heppenheimer, Williams, Gardner, JJ. 10.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pfeiffer v. Crossley, 106 A. 892, 92 N.J.L. 638, 1919 N.J. LEXIS 233 (N.J. 1919).

106 A. 892 (Pfeiffer v. Crossley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.