Pfeiffer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. P. R. Co.

73 Ill. App. 416, 1897 Ill. App. LEXIS 343
CourtAppellate Court of Illinois
DecidedFebruary 14, 1898
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Ill. App. 416 (Pfeiffer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. P. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pfeiffer v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. P. R. Co., 73 Ill. App. 416, 1897 Ill. App. LEXIS 343 (Ill. Ct. App. 1898).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Windes

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Appellant, an employee of appellee as a section hand, was injured on August 31, 1891, while on a handcar being propelled by the section crew, by appellee’s engine, and brought suit to recover damages. On a trial had before the Superior Court and a jury, at the close of plaintiff’s evidence, on motion of appellee, the court instructed the jury to find a verdict for appellee, which was done, and judgment rendered on the verdict. Appellant has appealed, and claims that the trial court erred in instructing a verdict for appellee, and in rendering judgment thereon.

The negligence charged is that appellee, by its servants (not fellow servants of appellant)", willfully, carelessly and improperly drove said engine and car attached toward and upon said handcar, etc., per quod appellant was thrown from said handcar over an embankment or grade to and upon the ground below, and injured, etc. Appellee pleaded the general issue, and a special plea not here in question. The evidence as to the manner of the accident was, in substance, viz.:

Joseph Pfeiffer, the plaintiff, testified: “I am the plaintiff in this cause. The latter part of August, 1891, I was working for the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul Railway Company on section work. I recollect the thirty-first of August, 1891. I started to work that morning at 7 o’clock. We rode to the place of work on a handcar, leaving Elgin ten or fifteen minutes after seven. There were eleven men on the handcar ; the section foreman was Pat Moran. Ten minutes before 8 o’clock we were at the bridge, over which the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul crosses the Northwestern road; no trains passed us going to the bridge. When close to the bridge a man called out ‘a train is coming. ’ I stood in the middle with my back toward the machine, toward the engine. There is a sharp curve a quarter of a mile before the bridge. (It is agreed that at and near, the place of the accident the Milwaukee track in question extended in a westerly direction, and there crossed over the Chicago and Northwestern Railroad track by means of an overhead viaduct or bridge). The Northwestern track was running at the bottom of and lengthwise of the ravine, north' and south, and the Milwaukee track crossed above it on this viaduct, and the Milwaukee track ran on an embankment that had been built up there, and the embankment was sufficient to make a proper approach to the trestle, so that the Milwaukee track at the bridge and approach was higher than the valley or ravine which it crossed. The handcar just went into the bridge when a man called out ‘a train is coming.’ The handcar was eight or ten feet on the bridge. As soon as I heard the man call out, I looked around to see if I could jump, but I could not do it any more. Eight after that I turned around, and I saw it coming.

“Q. How far was the engine from the handcar at that time?

“A. 600 feet. ,

“Q. How rapidly was the handcar moving?

“A. We went terribly fast. As fast as an ordinary train.

“The Court: You were on the same track with the engine were you?

“A. On the rails, yes, sir.

“Q. 600 feet away, did you say?

“A. Yes, sir.

“Mr. Williams: How fast was the engine going at that time?

“A. Fifty-two miles an hour.

“The bridge was about 130 feet long. After we looked around and saw the engine, we worked as fast as we could to get off the bridge. When we got to the further end of the bridge the engine caught us. At the moment we left the bridge the engine struck the handcar and gave me a shove and we flew off the handcar. There were eight men on the handcar at that time. The foreman was among them. I was thrown off down to the fence, thirty-five feet. I was dizzy and didn’t know what happened. After the engine struck the handcar it took it along; the engine took it along 900 " feet;

“Q. Can you state whether or not the engine stopped after carrying the handcar 900 feet away?

“A. Estopped alone, and there it stood.

“Q. What condition, if you know, was the handcar in at that time?

“A. Everything was broken. It was a Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul engine that struck the handcar.

“I worked for the railroad four days before I was hurt. I worked for the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul; I never worked for the Chicago, Milwaukee and St. Paul before as a section hand. The first day we laid ties; I was hired to lay the tracks.

“The work I was hired to do required me to be around the railroad tracks. I lived in Elgin. Every morning we would go to work along the track on this handcar. I would help to pump the handcar. Trains would come along during the day; trains would pass us while at work on the track. I watched for trains. I watched for trains in the direction I was standing. If a train was coming, we could take the handcar from the track quick enough. While I kept watch in one direction, the other section men kept watch in the other direction. I could not tell when trains were coming except by keeping watch. Just before we started that morning a train went west. When the train went west that morning-we stopped in the tool house at Elgin. That train was a regular train. It came every day. I don’t know whether it carried green flags or not. I did not see it. I was in the tool house. Eleven men started on the handcar. I faced west.

“I kept watch towards the west for trains; the others kept watch for trains from the east. I did not know when we started when the next train would come nor from what direction it would come. For my part I looked out, so I am not run over. Our section was from Elgin to McQueen. We were on our own section. We had picks and shovels on the floor of the handcar. They did not make a noise. We could hear if a train was coming. There are a good many curves in the track between Elgin and McQueen. I do not know how many. There are several other sharp curves on the track just east of the bridge. The train goes on this curve through a cut, before it gets on the bridge. We kept watch when we got to that curve just east of the bridge. The handcar was going like a slow freight train. We did not stop near the curve. We got about eight feet on the bridge when this man called out a train was coming. I do not know how many miles an hour the handcar was going. I do not know which way the man was facing who called out a train was coming. I looked back east. When I looked back I saw the train.

“Q. How far away was it then?

1 ‘A. Bight rails long—that is 240 feet. It had come around the curve and through the cut. It was plain in sight when we looked around. I think the train was going fifty-two miles an hour. I can not tell exactly. I am not an expert. I did not try to get off: the handcar then. We all tried to go faster and get over the bridge, and got clear over the bridge onto the ground before the train came to us. I didn’t get off that handcar before the engine struck it. There were eight men on the handcar with me when the engine struck it. It threw me down into the ditch. I wanted to jump. I was standing -in the middle.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Toledo, Wabash & Western Railway Co. v. O'Connor
77 Ill. 391 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1875)
Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. Peterson
32 Ill. App. 139 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1889)
Pennsylvania Railroad v. Wachter
60 Md. 395 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1883)
Jolly v. Detroit, Lansing & Northern Railroad
53 N.W. 526 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1892)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Ill. App. 416, 1897 Ill. App. LEXIS 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeiffer-v-chicago-milwaukee-st-p-r-co-illappct-1898.