Pfeffer v. Board of Education

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pfeffer v. Board of Education

87 A.D.2d 595, 450 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15865

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 8, 1982

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 87 A.D.2d 595 (Pfeffer v. Board of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pfeffer v. Board of Education, 87 A.D.2d 595, 450 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15865 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article '78 in which a judgment had previously been entered directing respondents to reinstate petitioner as a probationary teacher, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kartell, J.), dated May 27,1981, which dismissed his application pursuant to CPLR 5104 to hold respondents in contempt of court. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Since the decretal paragraphs in the 1976 judgment which petitioner seeks to enforce by way of a contempt proceeding are ambiguous, Special Term properly dismissed the petition. (See Cleary v Kenny Scow Corp., 57 AD2d 313.) Weinstein, J. P., O’Connor, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article '78 in which a judgment had previously been entered directing respondents to reinstate petitioner as a probationary teacher, petitioner appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Kartell, J.), dated May 27,1981, which dismissed his application pursuant to CPLR 5104 to hold respondents in contempt of court. Judgment affirmed, without costs or disbursements. Since the decretal paragraphs in the 1976 judgment which petitioner seeks to enforce by way of a contempt proceeding are ambiguous, Special Term properly dismissed the petition. (See Cleary v Kenny Scow Corp., 57 AD2d 313.) Weinstein, J. P., O’Connor, Bracken and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

87 A.D.2d 595, 450 N.Y.S.2d 412, 1982 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15865, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfeffer-v-board-of-education-nyappdiv-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack