Pfantz v. Culver & Co.

13 Iowa 312
CourtSupreme Court of Iowa
DecidedJune 9, 1862
StatusPublished

This text of 13 Iowa 312 (Pfantz v. Culver & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pfantz v. Culver & Co., 13 Iowa 312 (iowa 1862).

Opinion

Wright, J.

Tbe rejection of tbe testimony, objected to by defendants, and admitted in tbe court below, would not avail them, for tbe plaintiff is entitled to judgment upon tbe averments contained in bis petition, wbicb stand undenied. If, therefore, tbe testimony was improperly admitted, [313]*313(and sueb is our opinion,) it is an error without prejudice. For if the cause, for this error, should be reversed and remanded, defendants are in default, and in no condition to controvert the allegations of the petition, which are clearly sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to judgment. Defendants were in court, made an appearance, but made no answer, nor excuse therefor.

The judgment must, therefore, stand

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
13 Iowa 312, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfantz-v-culver-co-iowa-1862.