Pfahler v. Natl. Latex Prod. Co.

737 N.E.2d 1290, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1463, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2999
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 13, 2000
Docket00-1921
StatusPublished

This text of 737 N.E.2d 1290 (Pfahler v. Natl. Latex Prod. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pfahler v. Natl. Latex Prod. Co., 737 N.E.2d 1290, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1463, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2999 (Ohio 2000).

Opinion

Ashland App. No. 00COA01380. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ashland County. On November 9, 2000, appellee filed a motion to strike appellants’ motion for stay pending appeal filed October 25, 2000. The motion to strike is, in substance, a response to appellants’ motion for stay pending appeal and, as such, is untimely under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4)(B). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits untimely filings,

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
737 N.E.2d 1290, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1463, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfahler-v-natl-latex-prod-co-ohio-2000.