Pfahler v. Natl. Latex Prod. Co.
This text of 737 N.E.2d 1290 (Pfahler v. Natl. Latex Prod. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Ashland App. No. 00COA01380. This cause is pending before the court as an appeal from the Court of Appeals for Ashland County. On November 9, 2000, appellee filed a motion to strike appellants’ motion for stay pending appeal filed October 25, 2000. The motion to strike is, in substance, a response to appellants’ motion for stay pending appeal and, as such, is untimely under S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(4)(B). Whereas S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(1)(C) prohibits untimely filings,
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion to strike be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
737 N.E.2d 1290, 90 Ohio St. 3d 1463, 2000 Ohio LEXIS 2999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfahler-v-natl-latex-prod-co-ohio-2000.