Pfaff v. Reddick

New York Court of Common Pleas

Pfaff v. Reddick

29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 472, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121

DecidedAugust 1, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 29 N.Y.S. 1148 (Pfaff v. Reddick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Common Pleas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pfaff v. Reddick, 29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 472, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Whatever was promised by the landlord to the tenant before the execution of the lease was merged in that instrument; and as the lease contains a covenant that the tenant will repair, and keep in repair, the premises during the demised term, the fact that the furnace and heater required some cleaning and other repairs in order to heat the premises does not release the tenant from the obligation to pay her rent. The final order should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Whatever was promised by the landlord to the tenant before the execution of the lease was merged in that instrument; and as the lease contains a covenant that the tenant will repair, and keep in repair, the premises during the demised term, the fact that the furnace and heater required some cleaning and other repairs in order to heat the premises does not release the tenant from the obligation to pay her rent. The final order should therefore be affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

29 N.Y.S. 1148, 9 Misc. 472, 61 N.Y. St. Rep. 121, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pfaff-v-reddick-nyctcompl-1894.