Pezzolanti v. Citicorp Retail Services, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Pezzolanti v. Citicorp Retail Services, Inc.

127 A.D.2d 643, 511 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43132

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 9, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 643 (Pezzolanti v. Citicorp Retail Services, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pezzolanti v. Citicorp Retail Services, Inc., 127 A.D.2d 643, 511 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43132 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for wrongful discharge and for employment benefits allegedly due to the plaintiff, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered July 16, 1985, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to dismiss his first cause of action to recover damages for wrongful discharge and for summary judgment dismissing so much of his second cause of action which was for severance pay, (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered July 3, 1985, as denied his motion for an order directing a deposition of Connie Handler, an employee of the defendants.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed [644]*644from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Lama at Special Term. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for wrongful discharge and for employment benefits allegedly due to the plaintiff, the plaintiff appeals, as limited by his brief, from (1) so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), entered July 16, 1985, as granted those branches of the defendants’ motion which were to dismiss his first cause of action to recover damages for wrongful discharge and for summary judgment dismissing so much of his second cause of action which was for severance pay, (2) so much of an order of the same court, entered July 3, 1985, as denied his motion for an order directing a deposition of Connie Handler, an employee of the defendants.

Ordered that the orders are affirmed insofar as appealed [644]*644from, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Lama at Special Term. Mangano, J. P., Bracken, Weinstein and Rubin, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 643, 511 N.Y.S.2d 781, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pezzolanti-v-citicorp-retail-services-inc-nyappdiv-1987.