Pezzillo v. Evans
This text of 131 F. App'x 106 (Pezzillo v. Evans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Benjamin Pezzillo (“Appellant”) appeals the district court’s grant of a motion to dismiss his employment discrimination action against Donald L. Evans, Secretary of the Department of Commerce, for failure to exhaust his administrative remedies with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Appellant failed to abide by 29 C.F.R. § 1614.504(c), which requires that “[a]llegations that subsequent acts of discrimination violate a settlement agreement ... be processed as separate complaints under § 1614.106 ..., rather than under this section.” Appellant failed to satisfy the precomplaint administrative exhaustion requirements of § 1614.106 and § 1614.105. Appellant’s November 2001 Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) complaint is not reasonably related to his 2000 EEO complaint because the allegations of the two complaints are distinctly different and involve different groups of personnel at different points in time; likewise, an allegation of breach of settlement agreement does not necessarily arise out of an original allegation of discrimination by wrongful termination. Appellant’s mere allegation of breach of settlement agreement fails to substantially comply with the presentment requirements of § 1614.105 and § 1614.106.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
131 F. App'x 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pezzillo-v-evans-ca9-2005.