Pezhman v. Young

37 A.D.3d 297, 828 N.Y.S.2d 891

This text of 37 A.D.3d 297 (Pezhman v. Young) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pezhman v. Young, 37 A.D.3d 297, 828 N.Y.S.2d 891 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sallie Manzanet, J.), entered February 28, 2006, which denied plaintiff’s motion for a default judgment and dismissed the complaint, unanimously modified, on the law, to the extent of reinstating the complaint, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.

The motion court dismissed the instant case on the basis of Supreme Court’s dismissal of similar claims in a separate related action. However, this Court reversed that dismissal and reinstated that complaint (29 AD3d 164 [2006]). Accordingly, the instant pro se complaint should be reinstated for the reasons stated therein. We find that the motion court properly denied [298]*298plaintiff a default judgment on the grounds that defendant adequately demonstrated a meritorious defense and that the default was the result of law office failure. Concur—Mazzarelli, J.E, Friedman, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Catterson, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pezhman v. City of New York
29 A.D.3d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
37 A.D.3d 297, 828 N.Y.S.2d 891, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pezhman-v-young-nyappdiv-2007.