Pezhman v. Department of Education

79 A.D.3d 543, 911 N.Y.S.2d 906
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 14, 2010
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 79 A.D.3d 543 (Pezhman v. Department of Education) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pezhman v. Department of Education, 79 A.D.3d 543, 911 N.Y.S.2d 906 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Karen S. Smith, J.), entered August 23, 2010, which denied plaintiffs motion to strike defendants’ answer, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Plaintiff failed to carry her burden of clearly demonstrating [544]*544that defendants’ failure to comply with disclosure obligations was willful, contumacious or in bad faith (compare Palmenta v Columbia Univ., 266 AD2d 90, 91 [1999], with Rodriguez v United Bronx Parents, Inc., 70 AD3d 492 [2010]). Plaintiff also failed to file the affirmation of good faith required by 22 NYCRR 202.7 (see 148 Magnolia, LLC v Merrimack Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 62 AD3d 486 [2009]). Concur — Tom, J.P., Andrias, Saxe, Freedman and Manzanet-Daniels, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ventura v. Ozone Park Holding Corp.
84 A.D.3d 516 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
79 A.D.3d 543, 911 N.Y.S.2d 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pezhman-v-department-of-education-nyappdiv-2010.