Peyton Yates Freiman v. Aames Capital Corporation

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided June 28, 2011·No. 03-10-00107-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-11-00024-CV

Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C., Appellants // J. Black’s, L.P. and J. Black’s, G.P., L.L.C., Cross-Appellants

v.

J. Black’s, L.P. and J. Black’s, G.P., L.L.C., Appellees // Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C., Cross-Appellees

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 345TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GN-09-001436, HONORABLE JOHN K. DIETZ, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellees J. Black’s, L.P. and J. Black’s G.P., L.L.C. have filed a motion to dismiss this appeal and their own cross-appeal, asserting that the trial court has granted a motion for new trial in this cause and that no final or otherwise appealable order has been issued. In their written response to this motion, appellants Bob E. Woody and The Ranch, L.L.C. agree that the trial court has not yet rendered a final judgment and that the notice of appeal is premature. This Court’s jurisdiction is limited to the review of final judgments and certain interlocutory orders signed by the trial court. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 51.012, .014 (West 2008); see also Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp., 39 S.W.3d 191, 195 (Tex. 2001). Accordingly, we grant the appellees’ motion and dismiss this appeal for want of jurisdiction.

Diane M. Henson, Justice

Before Chief Justice Jones, Justices Henson and Goodwin Dismissed for Want of Jurisdiction Filed: June 28, 2011

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Peyton Yates Freiman v. Aames Capital Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2011).

Peyton Yates Freiman v. Aames Capital Corporation (Peyton Yates Freiman v. Aames Capital Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lehmann v. Har-Con Corp.
39 S.W.3d 191 (Texas Supreme Court, 2001)