Peyton v. Veitch

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

Peyton v. Veitch

2 D.C. 123

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia

DecidedNovember 15, 1816

StatusPublished

This text of 2 D.C. 123 (Peyton v. Veitch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Peyton v. Veitch, 2 D.C. 123 (circtddc 1816).

Pincite

Opinion

[125]*125Bills of exception were taken, but no writ of error prosecuted.

Upon the question whether the illegality of the payment should prevent the plaintiff from recovering, the defendants’ counsel cited 1 Esp. N. P. 89, 21 and 23; Mabin v. Colson, 4 Dall. 298; Belding v. Pitkin, 2 Caines, 147; and the plaintiff’s counsel cited Holman v. Johnson, Cowp. 341; Digges v. Lawrence, 3 T. R. 454; Waymell v. Reed, 5 T. R. 599, and Esp. N. P. 20, Am. Ed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[125]*125Bills of exception were taken, but no writ of error prosecuted.

Upon the question whether the illegality of the payment should prevent the plaintiff from recovering, the defendants’ counsel cited 1 Esp. N. P. 89, 21 and 23; Mabin v. Colson, 4 Dall. 298; Belding v. Pitkin, 2 Caines, 147; and the plaintiff’s counsel cited Holman v. Johnson, Cowp. 341; Digges v. Lawrence, 3 T. R. 454; Waymell v. Reed, 5 T. R. 599, and Esp. N. P. 20, Am. Ed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2 D.C. 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peyton-v-veitch-circtddc-1816.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack