Peyton v. Planters' Compress Co.
63 Miss. 410
This text of 63 Miss. 410 (Peyton v. Planters' Compress Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Peyton v. Planters' Compress Co., 63 Miss. 410 (Mich. 1886).
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The cases of Bullard v. Dorsey, 7 S. & M. 9; Moody v. Willis, 41 Miss. 347, and Chambliss v. Matthews, 57 Miss. 306, are entirely harmonious, and are all approved, but-each presents a different case from the other. The case now before us falls precisely within the rule announced in Moody v. Willis, wherefore the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gohld v. Svendsgaard
141 Minn. 437 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1919)
Brashears v. Johnson
64 So. 722 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
63 Miss. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peyton-v-planters-compress-co-miss-1886.