Peyton v. Planters' Compress Co.
63 Miss. 410
Opinion
delivered the opinion of the court.
The cases of Bullard v. Dorsey, 7 S. & M. 9; Moody v. Willis, 41 Miss. 347, and Chambliss v. Matthews, 57 Miss. 306, are entirely harmonious, and are all approved, but-each presents a different case from the other. The case now before us falls precisely within the rule announced in Moody v. Willis, wherefore the judgment is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Peyton v. Planters' Compress Co., 63 Miss. 410 (Mich. 1886).
63 Miss. 410 (Peyton v. Planters' Compress Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gohld v. Svendsgaard
141 Minn. 437 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1919)
Brashears v. Johnson
64 So. 722 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1914)