Peysina v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Peysina v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.

138 So. 3d 1137, 2014 WL 1921752, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7142

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 14, 2014·No. No. 3D14-8·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm because competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Deutsche Bank National Trust Company conducted an adequate search to locate Natalia Peysina prior to constructive service. See generally Giron v. Ugly Mortg., Inc., 935 So.2d 580, 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“If there is a challenge to constructive service, the trial court has the duty of determining ... whether the plaintiff conducted an adequate search to locate the defendants. Our standard of review determines whether there was competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the trial judge.”) (internal citation omitted).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm because competent, substantial evidence supports the trial court’s finding that Deutsche Bank National Trust Company conducted an adequate search to locate Natalia Peysina prior to constructive service. See generally Giron v. Ugly Mortg., Inc., 935 So.2d 580, 582 (Fla. 3d DCA 2006) (“If there is a challenge to constructive service, the trial court has the duty of determining ... whether the plaintiff conducted an adequate search to locate the defendants. Our standard of review determines whether there was competent substantial evidence to support the decision of the trial judge.”) (internal citation omitted).

Peysina v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co., 138 So. 3d 1137, 2014 WL 1921752, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 7142 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

138 So. 3d 1137 (Peysina v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related