Pew v. McCaul

Superior Court of New York

Pew v. McCaul

31 N.Y.S. 1132

CourtThe Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo

DecidedJanuary 7, 1895

StatusPublished

This text of 31 N.Y.S. 1132 (Pew v. McCaul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of the City of New York and Buffalo primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Pew v. McCaul, 31 N.Y.S. 1132 (superctny 1895).

Pincite

Opinion

FREEDMAN, J.

The judgment appealed from is for foreclosure and sale under a mechanic’s lien filed hy plaintiff. The substantial controversy between the parties was as to the amount due under the lien. Upon a full review of the whole case, it appears that, upon the evidence, the referee had sufficient grounds •for finding, and for refusing to find, as he did; that the exceptions taken by the defendants to the rulings of the referee upon questions of evidence are without merit, and that no substantial reason exists which calls for reversal. The judgment should be •affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FREEDMAN, J.

The judgment appealed from is for foreclosure and sale under a mechanic’s lien filed hy plaintiff. The substantial controversy between the parties was as to the amount due under the lien. Upon a full review of the whole case, it appears that, upon the evidence, the referee had sufficient grounds •for finding, and for refusing to find, as he did; that the exceptions taken by the defendants to the rulings of the referee upon questions of evidence are without merit, and that no substantial reason exists which calls for reversal. The judgment should be •affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 N.Y.S. 1132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pew-v-mccaul-superctny-1895.