Pew v. McCaul

11 Misc. 711, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedJanuary 15, 1895
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Misc. 711 (Pew v. McCaul) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Pew v. McCaul, 11 Misc. 711, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1895).

Opinion

Freedman, J.

The judgment appealed from is for foreclosure and sale under a mechanic’s lien filed by plaintiff. [712]*712. The substantial controversy between the parties vjas as to the amount due under the lien. Upon a full' review of the whole cáse, it appears that upon the- evidence the referee had sufficient, grounds for finding, and for refusing to find,, as he did; that the exceptions- taken by the defendants to the rulings of the referee upon questions of evidence are without merit, and that' no substantial reason- exists- which, calls for reversal..

The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.

McAdam and Gildersleeve, JJ., concur.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Misc. 711, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 879, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/pew-v-mccaul-nysuperctnyc-1895.