Peurifoy, Rec'r v. Continental Finance Co.

162 S.E. 458, 164 S.C. 261, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 25
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJanuary 14, 1932
Docket13327
StatusPublished
Cited by8 cases

This text of 162 S.E. 458 (Peurifoy, Rec'r v. Continental Finance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Peurifoy, Rec'r v. Continental Finance Co., 162 S.E. 458, 164 S.C. 261, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 25 (S.C. 1932).

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Acting Associate Justice John I. Cosgrove.

The American Bank & Trust Company, of Columbia, closed its doors in June, 1926, and in the above-entitled cause of Rice v. City of Columbia, Hon. Jas. E. Peurifoy was appointed its receiver.

This action was brought by him, as receiver, in March, 1928, against the above-named appellant, Continental Finance Company, seeking instructions as to the payment of a claim filed by that company with him.

The Court was asked to determine whether or not the finance company was entitled to have its claim under four certificates of deposit declared a trust or preferred claim against the assets of the insolvent bank. Flis Honor, Circuit Judge Ramage, heard the case upon an agreed statement of facts and affidavits and filed his decree denying the preference. From that decree comes this appeal.

We have given careful consideration to the questions presented by appellant’s exceptions. Judge Ramage, in his elabrate and well-considered decree, passed adversely upon the same questions presented by these exceptions. His findings of fact and conclusions of law are satisfactory to this Court. The decree will be reported.

It is the judgment of this Court, therefore, that the'order and judgment appealed from be affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Stabler and Carter concur. Mr. Justice Coti-iran dissents. Mr. Chiee Justice Blease disqualified.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte M.F.S. L. Ass'n
18 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)
Zimmerman v. Central Union Bank
18 S.E.2d 592 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1942)
Spartan Mills v. Law
194 S.E. 653 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1938)
South Carolina State Bank v. Citizens' Bank
176 S.E. 346 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)
Temple v. McKay, County Treasurer
174 S.E. 23 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1934)
Ex Parte Michie
165 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)
Nettles v. People's Bank
165 S.E. 359 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
162 S.E. 458, 164 S.C. 261, 1932 S.C. LEXIS 25, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/peurifoy-recr-v-continental-finance-co-sc-1932.