Petuskey v. Rampton
This text of 307 F. Supp. 231 (Petuskey v. Rampton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Utah primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The restraining order heretofore issued upon the motion of Brian Florence is dissolved; his motion for leave to file a supplemental complaint is denied; his motion to intervene herein is denied, and this three-judge court is hereby dissolved, the purposes for which it was convened and for which it acquired and retained jurisdiction being deemed served, and the application to intervene being neither timely, appropriate nor sufficient for those purposes.
Each member of the court reserves the right separately to state his views with respect to the issues raised by the petition to intervene and concerning this order in which LEWIS, Circuit Judge, and CHRISTENSEN, District Judge, concur. RITTER, Chief District Judge, dissents.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
307 F. Supp. 231, 1969 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 8657, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petuskey-v-rampton-utd-1969.