Petty v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Petty v. State

1923 OK CR 97, 214 P. 562, 23 Okla. Crim. 301, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 180

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 30, 1923

DocketNo. A-4119.

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK CR 97 (Petty v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Petty v. State, 1923 OK CR 97, 214 P. 562, 23 Okla. Crim. 301, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 180 (Okla. Ct. App. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Albert Petty, and Pat Pa-tiest, were jointly charged with the possession of one gallon and one quart of whisky with the intent to violate the prohibitory liquor laws. Defendant Patiest pleaded guilty. Upon his separate trial the jury returned a Verdict finding the defendant Albert Petty guilty, and fixed his punishment at confinement for 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on November 4, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed and no appearance made for oral argument. We have examined the record and find no material error. In our opinion the evidence sustains the .verdict.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error, Albert Petty, and Pat Pa-tiest, were jointly charged with the possession of one gallon and one quart of whisky with the intent to violate the prohibitory liquor laws. Defendant Patiest pleaded guilty. Upon his separate trial the jury returned a Verdict finding the defendant Albert Petty guilty, and fixed his punishment at confinement for 30 days in the county jail and a fine of $50. From the judgment rendered on the verdict an appeal was perfected by filing in this court on November 4, 1921, a petition in error with case-made. No brief has been filed and no appearance made for oral argument. We have examined the record and find no material error. In our opinion the evidence sustains the .verdict.

The judgment of the lower court is therefore affirmed.

MATSON, P. J., and BESSEY, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK CR 97, 214 P. 562, 23 Okla. Crim. 301, 1923 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 180, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/petty-v-state-oklacrimapp-1923.